Marlin 1895 Trapper features the same platform as Marlin 1895 SBL. From many points of view,
it can be considered its successor. But is it really better? Here’s everything you need to know
when comparing Marlin 1895 SBL vs Trapper.
Marlin 1895 SBL vs Trapper – A few things in common
Both guns are based on the same platform, they’re similar in size and capabilities. Both SBL and
Trapper rely on the 45-70 caliber. They use a solid cartridge with exquisite power, hence their
popularity in the hunting industry.
Other than that, they both rely on the lever-action mechanism. Another thing in common
includes the hammer block safety, not to mention the appearance. If you weren’t familiar with
the slight differences, you couldn’t tell them apart. After all, both firearms come with a satin
stainless steel finish.
The receiver hasn’t suffered any upgrades either. Both guns rely on a stainless steel, drilled, and
The capacity can make a difference in terms of convenience. When comparing Marlin 1895 SBL
vs Trapper, it’s worth noting that SBL comes with a 6+1 tubular magazine. On the other
hand, Trapper features a 5+1 tubular magazine.
The difference is not impressive, but when you use the firearm for more hours, the SBL simply
feels a bit more convenient.
Comparing Trapper vs Marlin 1895 SBL is much easier when you pay attention to their main
Marlin 1895 SBL comes with sling swivel studs, just like Marlin 1895 Trapper . SBL has a large
loop, while Trapper features a big loop lever.
Other than that, they both have a similar safety lock, as well as bollard cut type rifling.
SBL will impress you with its XS ghost ring with a scout scope base. Trapper proudly presents a
ramp at the front and a skinner peep at the rear. In theory, Trapper’s style should be a bit more
versatile, but there are lots of users who prefer SBL’s classic design.
Stock and butt plate
The stock won’t bring in any major differences. At the end of the day, it’s a matter of personal
preferences. SBL has a traditional black and grey laminated stock, while Trapper comes with a
black painted laminate stock.
The butt plate in Trapper is more advanced though. SBL has a recoil pad, while Trapper has the
same design, but it’s vented. The difference is insignificant, but some users have reported
feeling better with Trapper’s design.
Trapper has been introduced as a more advanced version of SBL, but without any significant
upgrades. It’s also designed as a more compact firearm.
For instance, SBL has a barrel length of 18.5 inches. On the other hand, Trapper’s barrel only
measures 16.5 inches.
Despite the compact design, Trapper is not much lighter, with both units weighing around eight
pounds each. The difference isn’t major, but when you go hunting for half a day, chances are
you’d rather have a modern Trapper. It’ smaller, lighter, and more compact, so it’s easier to
carry around too.
A couple of inches and about a pound in weight, that’s what you can count as a difference
between the two.
Talking about design and appearance, Trapper has more curves and while the concept is similar,
it simply looks more modern.
In terms of sizing and weight, this may seem a bit subjective, but the extra length and weight on
SBL makes it feel a bit more balanced. Again, it depends on what kind of rifles you’re used to.
But generally speaking, SBL falls in a general category, so most people should be used to it.
Trapper feels a bit too light and not perfectly balanced, but given its size, it’s more convenient
for smaller users.
In terms of accuracy, you won’t see too many differences, but then again, it depends on the
Try both firearms from 100 yards and you won’t spot any differences at all. Accuracy is amazing
and just like always, it’s one of the things that make Marlin rifles stand out in the crowd.
When you shoot from 200 or 300 yards, you may lose a bit of accuracy with Trapper, mainly
because of the shorter barrel. Go over 300 yards and Trapper will show a bit of a weakness. Of
course, it doesn’t mean it will shoot in the opposite direction, but you’ll still be able to see the
Reviews and testimonials
Comparing Trapper vs Marlin 1895 SBL also implies going through others’ reviews and
testimonials, seeing what kind of experience people have with each of them.
If this is the only thing to help you differentiate the two, you’ll get some headache because
everyone loves them. Both SBL and Trapper offer an optimal experience, great versatility,
exquisite accuracy, and a top-notch overall experience.
There’s also a bit of a surprise here because avid Marlin fans can always agree that having both
guns is better than trying to figure out which one is better. Of course, the budget would be the
only issue here because they don’t come cheap.
But then, you’ll be surprised to see a lot of hunters and shooting sportspeople have both.
Simply put, decide on one of them to purchase first based on their features, and they get the
other one later on.
Similar in experience, but with noticeable differences, they’ll both give you a good run and
excellent value for money. Besides, they seem to hold their value in the long run, so they make
As a short final conclusion, comparing Marlin 1895 SBL vs Trapper is a bit difficult. Both firearms
are based on the same platform and the differences are quite small for short range shooters.
Sure, there are a few changes in the design and convenience, but overall, you won’t notice a
The real change occurs if you like long distance shooting. Since Trapper is shorter, its accuracy
will be slightly affected in such cases. But that shouldn’t put you off because it’s still effective.
Plus, on a more positive note, being smaller and more compact means it’s also lighter than SBL.